Key result
Outflow-tract VT ablation shows ~87% lower recurrence when only a single morphology is inducible.
Why the study?
Does inducibility of ventricular tachycardia improve outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with sustained outflow-tract ventricular tachycardia without structural heart disease?
Population
54 patients without overt structural heart disease who underwent catheter ablation for symptomatic sustained…
Comparison
Catheter ablation guided by inducible sustained… vs Catheter ablation targeting premature…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
21 ± 19 months
Authors
Loading...
Single inducible VT morphology was associated with lower outflow-tract VT recurrence after ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
Cohort (n=54)
Does inducibility of ventricular tachycardia improve outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with sustained outflow-tract ventricular tachycardia without structural heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 46%
p-value: p=0.004
In patients with sustained outflow-tract VT without structural heart disease, inducibility of a single VT morphology during ablation is associated with significantly lower recurrence rates compared to non-inducible VT or multiple VT morphologies.
Choi et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Sustained outflow-tract ventricular tachycardia without overt structural heart disease (n=54). Catheter ablation with inducible single morphology VT vs. Catheter ablation with non-inducible VT or multiple VT morphologies was evaluated on VT recurrence (p=0.004). Catheter ablation for sustained outflow-tract VT resulted in lower VT recurrence when a single VT morphology was inducible (6%) compared to multiple morphologies (40%) or non-inducible VT (46%) (P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: