Key result
Epicardial VT ablation in structural heart disease achieves ~71% freedom from VT over 22 months.
Why the study?
Epicardial ablation has become essential in treating ventricular tachycardias, prompting the evaluation of its efficacy, risks, and trends in structural heart disease over a 12-year period.
Does epicardial ablation effectively and safely eliminate ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease?
Observational (n=236)
No
Does epicardial ablation effectively and safely eliminate ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease?
Epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease is feasible and effective, achieving 87% acute elimination and 71% long-term freedom from VT with an acceptably low major complication rate.
May support epicardial ablation for structural VT; leaves open need for randomized trials on comparative efficacy.
AIMS: Epicardial ablation has risen to an essential part of the treatment of ventricular tachycardias (VTs). In this study, we report the efficacy, risks, and current trends of epicardial ablation in structural heart disease as reported in a tertiary single centre over a 12-year period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients referred for VT ablation underwent a successful epicardial access and were included in the analysis (89% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 90% males, mean age 60 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 38.4%). After performing epicardial ablation the clinical VTs were eliminated in 87% of the patients and 71% of the cohort achieved freedom from VT during 22-month follow-up. Twelve patients (5%) suffered major procedure-related complications. Until the end of follow-up 47 (20%) patients died, 9 (4%) underwent a left ventricular assist device implantation and 10 (4%) patients received a heart transplantation. Antiarrhythmic drugs at baseline and during follow-up were independent predictors of VT recurrence. Atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, worse New York Heart Association class, and antiarrhythmic drugs at follow-up were associated with worse survival in our cohort. CONCLUSION: In this large tertiary single-centre experience, percutaneous epicardial access was feasible in the large majority of the cohort with acceptably low complications rates. A combined endo-/epicardial approach resulted in 87% acute and 71% long-term success. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of routine combined endo-/epicardial ablation in these complex cardiomyopathies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darma et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia with structural heart disease (n=236). Epicardial ablation was evaluated on Freedom from ventricular tachycardia. Epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease achieved 87% acute elimination of clinical VTs and 71% freedom from VT over a 22-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: