Key result
D5W irrigation for epicardial VT ablation is safe and shows comparable recurrence to normal saline.
Why the study?
Epicardial ablation is integral to treating ventricular tachycardias, prompting this evaluation of access safety and ablation efficacy in structural heart disease.
Does epicardial ablation using 5% dextrose in water (D5W) irrigation improve safety and efficacy compared to standard 0.9% normal saline in patients undergoing VT ablation?
Observational (n=197)
No
Does epicardial ablation using 5% dextrose in water (D5W) irrigation improve safety and efficacy compared to standard 0.9% normal saline in patients undergoing VT ablation?
Effect estimate: HR 1.028 (95% CI 0.642-1.644)
Absolute Event Rate: 44% vs 60%
p-value: p=0.909
Epicardial VT ablation using D5W irrigation is safe and feasible, with comparable short- and long-term efficacy to standard normal saline irrigation.
D5W irrigation may offer a viable alternative in epicardial VT ablation; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm comparable efficacy versus saline.
BACKGROUND: Epicardial ablation has become an integral part of the treatment of ventricular tachycardias (VT). This study reports the safety of epicardial access as well as the efficacy of epicardial ablation of structural heart disease in a tertiary single-center experience. METHODS: Between January 2016 and February 2022, consecutive patients undergoing an epicardial access for VT ablation were included. Different puncture techniques and occurrence of epicardial access-related complications as well as the safety of ablation using non-ionic 5% dextrose in water (D5W) compared to standard 0.9% normal saline (NS) irrigation were analyzed. VT recurrence rates during a mean follow-up of 37 ± 23 months were reported. RESULTS: In total, 197 patients undergoing a total of 239 procedures were included (59.8 ± 15.3 years, 86% males). A total of 154 patients (78%) had non-ischemic cardiomyopathies with a mean LVEF of 37 ± 14. Anterior-oriented epicardial access was aimed for in all cases and was successful in 217 (91%) of all procedures, whereas access was achieved in 19 procedures (8%) only using an inferior oriented access and in three procedures (1%) using surgical access due to severe adhesions or anatomical requirements. Overall epicardial puncture-related complications occurred in 18 (8%) of all procedures with minor pericardial bleeding in nine, pericardial tamponade in one, pneumothorax in five, pneumopericardium in one, and abdominal puncture in two cases. Presence of adhesions could be identified as the only independent predictor of epicardial access-related complications. D5W was used in 79 cases and regular 0.9% saline in 117 procedures. No differences were seen regarding acute ablation success or complications. During follow-up, 47% of all patients were free from any VTs (56% D5W vs. 40% NS; log-rank p = 0.747) and 92% of clinical VTs (98% D5W vs. 91% NS; log-rank p = 0.139). CONCLUSIONS: In this large single-centre experience, epicardial access and ablation were safe and feasible. Although long-term clinical VT recurrence rates were low, overall VT recurrences as well as mortality were high advocating for a highly experienced, interdisciplinary approach including intense management of underlying cardiac disease/heart failure. Routine usage of D5W was safe and associated with comparable short- or long-term clinical or overall VT freedom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia with structural heart disease (n=197). Non-ionic 5% dextrose in water (D5W) irrigation fluid vs. Standard 0.9% normal saline (NS) irrigation was evaluated on Any VT recurrence (HR 1.028, 95% CI 0.642-1.644, p=0.909). Routine usage of non-ionic 5% dextrose in water (D5W) irrigation fluid for epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation was safe and associated with comparable overall VT recurrence rates compared to normal saline (HR 1.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: