Key result
Stentys self-apposing stents show no clinical superiority over conventional balloon-expandable stents despite procedural success.
Why the study?
Does the Stentys self-apposing stent improve clinical outcomes compared to conventional balloon-expandable stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for complex lesions?
Does the Stentys self-apposing stent improve clinical outcomes compared to conventional balloon-expandable stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for complex lesions?
The Stentys self-apposing stent provides good procedural success in complex coronary lesions but does not offer superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional balloon-expandable stents.
Stentys self-apposing stent was designed to face complex lesions in the precincts of percutaneous coronary interventions. Nitinol platform and disconnectable struts were designed to provide a complete apposition on the vessel wall in challenging lesions such as significant tapering, primary angioplasty in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and bifurcation. Stentys X-position S is a sirolimus eluting stent with a novel delivery system aiming to improve positioning. Clinical trials showed good results in terms of procedural success rate, clinical outcome and short-term strut apposition. Nevertheless, Stentys stent did not show superiority over the conventional balloon-expandable stents in the clinical outcomes. Authors underlined the importance of a learning curve and an adequate training period to get familiar with the device’s features. Future trials in an all-comer population using the novel X-Position S stent will confirm the preliminary findings and strengthen evidence in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golino et al. (2021) conducted a review in Complex coronary lesions. Stentys self-apposing stent vs. Conventional balloon-expandable stents was evaluated on Clinical outcomes. The Stentys self-apposing stent showed good procedural success but did not demonstrate superiority over conventional balloon-expandable stents in clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: