Why the study?
The effects of tissue contact and respiration on electrogram voltage with differing depolarization wavefronts during multielectrode mapping remain unclear.
Do tissue contact and respiratory-phase gating settings improve the accuracy of ventricular substrate identification compared to standard settings in an ovine infarct model?
Do tissue contact and respiratory-phase gating settings improve the accuracy of ventricular substrate identification compared to standard settings in an ovine infarct model?
Tissue contact filters during high-density mapping reduce low voltage areas and improve agreement with cMRI-defined fibrosis in an ovine infarct model.
Should not yet change mapping practice; hypothesis-generating for refined VT substrate characterization in humans.
INTRODUCTION: Multielectrode mapping (MEM) and automated point collection are important enhancements to substrate mapping in ventricular tachycardia ablation. The effects of tissue contact and respiration on electrogram voltage with differing depolarization wavefronts with MEM catheters are unclear. METHODS: Bipolar and unipolar voltages were collected from control (n = 5) and infarcted (n = 7) animals with a multispline MEM catheter. Electro-anatomic maps were created in sinus rhythm, and right and left ventricular pacing. Analysis was performed across three collections: standard settings (SS), respiratory-phase gating (RG), and electrode-tissue proximity (TP). Comparison was made to scar detected by cardiac MRI (cMRI). RESULTS: Compared to SS and RG acquisition, median bipolar and unipolar voltages were higher using TP, regardless of the depolarization wavefront. In infarct animals, bipolar voltages were 30.7%-50.5% higher for bipolar and 8.7%-13.8% higher on unipolar voltages with TP, compared to SS. The effect of RG on bipolar and unipolar voltages was minimal. Percentage of local abnormal ventricular activities was not impacted by acquisition settings or wavefront direction in infarct animals. Compared with cMRI defined scar, all three acquisition settings overestimated scar area using standard voltage-based cutoffs. RG improved the low voltage area concordance with MRI by 1.6%-5.1% whereas TP improved by 5.9%-8.4%. CONCLUSIONS: High density voltage mapping with a MEM catheter is influenced by point collection settings. Tissue contact filters reduced low voltage areas and improved agreement with cMRI fibrosis in infarcted ovine hearts. These findings have critical implications for optimizing filter settings for high density substrate mapping in the left ventricle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: