Why the study?
To compare the short-term effectiveness between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure.
Does dapagliflozin compared to empagliflozin improve short-term effectiveness in patients with HFrEF in a low socioeconomic setting?
Cohort (n=60)
Open-label
None
No
Does dapagliflozin compared to empagliflozin improve short-term effectiveness in patients with HFrEF in a low socioeconomic setting?
An interim analysis of a Dominican HFrEF cohort comparing dapagliflozin and empagliflozin highlighted baseline demographic and risk factor variations but did not report definitive comparative effectiveness outcomes.
Baseline heterogeneity between SGLT2 inhibitors in this small observational cohort should not change practice; leaves open comparative effectiveness in low-resource HFrEF.
Background: Sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown efficacy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalizations for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concomitant heart failure. Aim: To compare the short-term effectiveness between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. Methods: A single-center observational cohort study was implemented in a Dominican tertiary-care center, where patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction were divided into two groups and treated with different SGLT2 inhibitor molecules, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. Two-step cluster analysis was conducted for the interim analysis of the study. Results: We enrolled a total of 60 patients, with a median age of 69. The majority of these were men (70%) and comprised 75.0% of the Dapagliflozin 10 mg group and 62.5% of the Empagliflozin 10 mg group. Most participants (61.7%) were categorized as NYHA-II in functional class. The main cause of heart failure was ischemic (55%), while the predominant state of the disease was chronic with 65% patients in this group. Conclusion: This preliminary manuscript evaluated the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in a Dominican heart failure patient cohort, finding notable gender, age, and risk factor variations, and emphasizing the need for standardized research methods in future investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=60). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin vs. Active comparator (each other) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: