Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Clinical registries for acute coronary syndromes are essential tools for evaluating real-world practice, assessing guideline adherence, and complementing data from randomized controlled trials.
The term registry in individual application to patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is discussed in this review. The author performs a detailed analysis of literature concerning objectives and goals of registries and their significance in clinical practice. The marked differences can be found between registries and randomized clinical trials (RCT). After the example of ACS registries the author shows the influence of information received according to registries limits on the formation of recommendations on treatment of patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
А. Д. Эрлих (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: