Why the study?
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, making the synthesis of current evidence on how regular physical activity impacts cardiovascular health essential.
Does exercise improve cardiovascular health and reduce disease risk?
Does exercise improve cardiovascular health and reduce disease risk?
This narrative review reinforces the role of regular physical activity, including aerobic and resistance training, as a key nonpharmacological intervention for preventing and managing cardiovascular diseases.
Supports exercise in CVD prevention; leaves open optimal dosing and adherence from prospective trials.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the major leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Lifestyle intervention in the form of regular physical activity has been given as key for the prevention and management of CVDs. This narrative review helps to synthesizes current evidence from literature published between the year 2010 and 2025 regarding the physiological, molecular, and clinical effects of exercise on cardiovascular health. The review tries to explore the various mechanisms mainly related with the endothelial function, blood pressure regulation, myocardial metabolism, cardiac remodelling, autonomic balance, and mitochondrial adaptations. Both aerobic and resistance training types of modalities and mechanisms are discussed, with special attention to population-specific outcomes such as in hypertensive, elderly, and heart failure patients. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-compliant methodology was used to select and identify 62 high-quality references, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, meta-analyses, and mechanistic investigations. Evidence supports that exercise is a powerful nonpharmacological intervention which helps to improve the cardiovascular function and reducing disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muley et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: