Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIMS: To investigate the relationship between angina pectoris and fatal and non-fatal clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HF-REF and HF-PEF, respectively). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 7599 patients in the CHARM program, 5408 had ischaemic heart disease; 3855 had HF-REF (ejection fraction ≤45%) and 1553 had HF-PEF. These patients were separated into three groups: no history of angina, previous angina, and current angina. Three coronary outcomes were examined: fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI); MI or hospitalization for unstable angina (UA); and MI, UA or coronary revascularization. The composite heart failure outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) was also analysed, along with its components and all-cause mortality. New York Heart Association functional class was worse in both HF-REF and HF-PEF patients with current angina compared with patients without angina (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005 respectively), despite similar clinical examination findings and ejection fraction. Patients with current angina had a higher risk of all three coronary outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 1.8-3.1) than those without angina but did not have a higher risk of heart failure outcomes or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure current angina is associated with significantly more functional limitation and a higher risk of coronary events, across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Athar Badar
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno
Aurora Health Care
Nathaniel M. Hawkins
Heart Failure & Transplant
European Journal of Heart Failure
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Imperial College London
Duke University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Badar et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1070ec261a48a43dfc983e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.221
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: