Key result
The A&D UA-767 blood pressure monitor satisfied AAMI criteria and achieved a BHS grade of A/A, with mean differences of -0.4±5.4 mmHg for SBP and -0.4±4.8 mmHg for DBP compared to mercury manometer.
Why the study?
Does the A&D UA-767 automatic blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer in adults?
Population
101 subjects aged 15-85 years with arm circumferences of 22-39 cm, a systolic blood pressure range of 89-206…
Comparison
Blood pressure measurement using the automatic… vs Simultaneous auscultatory measurements by two…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Supports accuracy in this cohort; leaves open generalizability and outcome impact before practice change.
Cross-Sectional (n=101)
Does the A&D UA-767 automatic blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer in adults?
The A&D UA-767 automatic blood pressure monitor meets AAMI and BHS criteria for accuracy and is recommended for home and clinical use in adults.
Рогоза et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure measurement (n=101). A&D UA-767 device vs. Mercury manometer and dual stethoscope was evaluated on Agreement between UA-767 and mercury sphygmomanometer according to AAMI and BHS criteria. The A&D UA-767 blood pressure monitor satisfied AAMI criteria and achieved a BHS grade of A/A, with mean differences of -0.4±5.4 mmHg for SBP and -0.4±4.8 mmHg for DBP compared to mercury manometer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: