Key result
Percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device reduced end-diastolic volume index from 112 to 100 mL and increased ejection fraction from 38% to 46% (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device improve hemodynamic parameters in patients with symptomatic ischemic heart failure and LV antero-apical wall motion abnormalities?
Observational (n=10)
Does percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device improve hemodynamic parameters in patients with symptomatic ischemic heart failure and LV antero-apical wall motion abnormalities?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 112%
p-value: p=<0.05
Percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device significantly improves left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and contractile function in patients with ischemic heart failure.
Associated with improved LV volumes and EF in small cohort; leaves open whether Parachute device alters clinical outcomes in ischemic HF.
BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) dilatation and remodeling following acute myocardial infarction increases wall stress, ventricular volumes and leads to heart failure (HF), which is associated with a high mortality. Percutaneous ventricular restoration (pVR) therapy reduces LV volumes leading to a more effective ejection. This study investigated the hemodynamic effects of LV volume reduction from pVR on LV performance and its interaction with the arterial system.MethodsTen patients with symptomatic ischemic HF of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II to IV with LV antero-apical wall motion abnormalities underwent Parachute implantation. Pressure-volume loops were recorded immediately pre- and post-pVR implantation and at 6-month follow up.ResultsParachute implantation significantly reduced end-diastolic volume index (from 112 ± 39 mL to 100 ± 41 mL; p < 0.05), with a greater relative reduction in end-systolic volume index (from 66 ± 33 mL to 56 ± 32 mL; p < 0.05) with an overall 7% increase in ejection fraction (from 38 ± 11 to 46 ± 14%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was an observed reduction in dyssynchrony index (from 20 ± 4 to 14 ± 6%; p < 0.05) and enhanced contractile function (Ees) immediately post-procedure, sustained at 6-months (from 0.92 ± 0.27 mmHg/mL to 1.37 ± 0.52 mmHg/mL, p < 0.05).ConclusionThis present study confirms positive hemodynamic effects of LV volume reduction using the Parachute percutaneous ventricular restoration device. The Parachute device improved synchronous contraction and enhanced ventricular-arterial interaction likely due to LV reverse remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patterson et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Symptomatic ischemic heart failure (n=10). Parachute device (percutaneous ventricular restoration) vs. Pre-implantation baseline was evaluated on End-diastolic volume index (p=<0.05). Percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device reduced end-diastolic volume index from 112 to 100 mL and increased ejection fraction from 38% to 46% (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: