Key result
Single-item self-report questions for HF inactivity correlate weakly with accelerometers but provide 92% specificity.
Why the study?
The study was designed to explore the utility of two single-item self-report questions to assess physical inactivity in patients with heart failure.
Do single-item self-report questions accurately assess physical inactivity in patients with chronic heart failure compared to accelerometry?
Cross-Sectional (n=106)
Do single-item self-report questions accurately assess physical inactivity in patients with chronic heart failure compared to accelerometry?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single-item self-report question provides high-specificity screening to identify physically inactive heart failure patients, though sensitivity is low.
AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of two single-item self-report (SR) questions to assess physical inactivity in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a cross-sectional study using data from 106 patients with HF equipped with accelerometers for 1 week each. Two SR items relating to physical activity were also collected. Correlations between accelerometer activity counts and the SR items were analysed. Patients were classified as physically active or inactive on the basis of accelerometer counts, and the SR items were used to try to predict that classification. Finally, patients were classified as having high self-reported physical activity or low self-reported physical activity, on the basis of the SR items, and the resulting groups were analysed for differences in actual physical activity. There were significant but weak correlations between the SR items and accelerometer counts: ρ = 0.24, P = 0.016 for SR1 and ρ = 0.21, P = 0.033 for SR2. Using SR items to predict whether a patient was physically active or inactive produced an area under the curve of 0.62 for SR1, with a specificity of 92% and a sensitivity of 30%. When dividing patients into groups on the basis of SR1, there was a significant difference of 1583 steps per day, or 49% more steps in the high self-reported physical activity group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There might be utility in the single SR question for high-specificity screening of large populations to identify physically inactive patients in order to assign therapeutic interventions efficiently where resources are limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blomqvist et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic Heart Failure (n=106). Single-item self-report (SR) questions vs. Accelerometer activity counts was evaluated on Correlation between accelerometer activity counts and the SR items (ρ = 0.24, p=0.016). Single-item self-report questions to assess physical inactivity in heart failure patients showed weak correlations with accelerometer counts and predicted inactivity with 92% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: