Key result
Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism was identified in 14.9% of lung cancer outpatients and was associated with longer survival compared to symptomatic pulmonary embolism.
Observational (n=141)
Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism is highly prevalent (14.9%) in lung cancer outpatients undergoing chemotherapy, occurring early in the disease course and highlighting the need for preventive strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism detection should not yet change management in lung cancer; this cohort study leaves open the value of routine screening.
Aims and background The incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in cancer patients is unknown and strictly related to the imaging used for tumor assessment. Recent findings suggest a similar clinical outcome of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism events compared to symptomatic events with a significant impact on survival. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in a population of lung cancer outpatients and to investigate its clinical features. Methods Outpatients with a diagnosis of lung carcinoma undergoing chemotherapy were selected from October 2006 to June 2009. Disease and patient characteristics, risk factors and treatment modalities were collected. All the computed tomography images performed for each patient during the study period were retrospectively reviewed to identify pulmonary embolism. Results A total of 141 consecutive patients were included and 657 computed tomography scans were completely reviewed (from two to six consecutive scans for each patient). Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in the study population had a prevalence of 14.9% (21 patients). Most of the events occurred in patients with adenocarcinoma, advanced stage and poor performance status, during the early phases of first-line chemotherapy or at the same time of the cancer diagnosis. Compared with the symptomatic pulmonary embolism events (5 patients), asymptomatic events occurred earlier (time from cancer diagnosis to pulmonary embolism of 3.5 [95% CI, 2.0–4.9] versus 12.1 months [95% CI, 6.3–17.9; P = 0.02]) and had a better prognosis (survival from PE of 7.5 [95% CI, 3.4–11.6] versus 1.9 months [95% CI, 0–3.9; P = 0.04]). Conclusions Our findings indicate an underestimation of embolic events among lung cancer outpatients due to their frequent asymptomatic natur. Such a high prevalence suggests the importance to pay more attention to pulmonary embolism prevention in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiseo et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Lung cancer (n=141). Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism vs. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism was evaluated on Survival from pulmonary embolism (months) (p=0.04). Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism was identified in 14.9% of lung cancer outpatients and was associated with longer survival compared to symptomatic pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: