Key result
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity increased significantly with age (r=0.894; p<0.001) and blood pressure category (ρ=0.081; p<0.001) in adults referred for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Why the study?
Clinical application of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity to stratify cardiovascular risk has been limited in Latin America by the absence of reference values.
Observational (n=3,160)
No
This study establishes reference values for pulse wave velocity based on age and blood pressure categories for a Latin American population, recommending the 90th percentile as a cut-off for cardiovascular risk stratification.
PWV age- and BP-specific references may aid stratification in Latin Americans; leaves open prospective validation of 90th-percentile cutoffs.
Background: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a direct measure of aortic stiffness used in the stratification of cardiovascular risk. Its clinical application in Latin America has been limited by the absence of reference values. The objective of this study was to establish PWV reference values among adults referred to a specialized cardiology center for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in Medellín, Colombia.Methods: A descriptive study of 3,160 records of adult (older than 18 years) patients without pharmacological treatment assessed for PWV using a Mobil-O-Graph® 24-hour PWA device (IEM, Stolberg, Germany) and 24-hour ABPM with hemodynamic parameters based on suspected hypertension or hypotension was conducted. Patient records were categorized by decade of age and sub-divided based on the following 24-hour ABPM categories: normal (< 130/80 mmHg), grade I hypertension (between 130–150/80–90 mmHg), and grade II hypertension (> 150/90 mmHg).Results: PWV increased with age (r = 0,894; p < 0,001) and blood pressure category (ρ = 0,081; p < 0,001); the age-related increase was more pronounced among the patients in the higher blood pressure categories. Measures of central tendency and dispersion regarding PWV are presented, and reference values are proposed from the 90th percentile based on the age and 24-hour ABPM categories.Conclusions: PWV is directly related to age and blood pressure and can be predicted using a simple equation that includes these two variables. To stratify the cardiovascular risk of patients and make clinical decisions, the 90th percentile based on the age and 24-hour ABPM categories is recommended as a cut-off.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aristizábal-Ocampo et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Suspected hypertension or hypotension (n=3,160). Pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement was evaluated on PWV correlation with age and blood pressure (r = 0.894, p=<0.001). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity increased significantly with age (r=0.894; p<0.001) and blood pressure category (ρ=0.081; p<0.001) in adults referred for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: