What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of matching patients to providers based on historical performance in improving mental health outcomes.

A large-scale evaluation of provider-patient matching in an employer-sponsored mental health program

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Randomized trial demonstrates improved mental health outcomes in participants using matched therapists, suggesting effective therapeutic fit.

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of matching patients to providers based on historical performance in improving mental health outcomes.
Conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2021-2024 with 24,303 participants using a mental health benefit.
Comparative analysis between matched therapists and self-selected therapists based on various metrics.
Utilized data-driven patient-provider matching algorithms informed by historical success with similar patients.
Patients with depression using matched therapists achieved an 8.5% faster improvement, b = 0.12 per log-day, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.09, p < 0.001.
Higher patient-provider fit scores correlated with increased therapeutic alliance, b = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.04-0.06, p < 0.001.
Total care cost was reduced by 12.9% per reliable change and 10.8% per recovery.

Ward et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Randomized trial demonstrates improved mental health outcomes in participants using matched therapists, suggesting effective therapeutic fit.

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of matching patients to providers based on historical performance in improving mental health outcomes.
Conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2021-2024 with 24,303 participants using a mental health benefit.
Comparative analysis between matched therapists and self-selected therapists based on various metrics.
Utilized data-driven patient-provider matching algorithms informed by historical success with similar patients.
Patients with depression using matched therapists achieved an 8.5% faster improvement, b = 0.12 per log-day, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.09, p < 0.001.
Higher patient-provider fit scores correlated with increased therapeutic alliance, b = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.04-0.06, p < 0.001.
Total care cost was reduced by 12.9% per reliable change and 10.8% per recovery.

Ward et al. (2026) studied this question.

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark