Key result
Row-column addressed arrays achieve up to ~0.97 R2 accuracy in simulated 3D carotid flow estimation.
Why the study?
The accuracy of row–column tensor velocity imaging on complex, clinically relevant flow had not been quantified.
Row-column addressed arrays with 62 receive channels can accurately measure complex 3-D flow fields at high volume rates in simulated carotid bifurcation models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Row-column arrays enable high-volume-rate 3D flow estimation in carotid simulations; leaves open in vivo validation and clinical translation.
In this work, the accuracy of row–column tensor velocity imaging (TVI), i.e., 3-D vector flow imaging (VFI) in 3-D space over time, is quantified on a complex, clinically relevant flow. The quantification is achieved by transferring the flow simulated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to a Field II simulation environment, and this allows for a direct comparison between the actual and estimated velocities. The carotid bifurcation flow simulations were performed with a peak inlet velocity of 80 cm/s, nonrigid vessel walls, and a flow cycle duration of 1.2 s. The flow was simulated from two observation angles, and it was acquired using a 3-MHz 62+62 row–column addressed array (RCA) at a pulse repetition frequency ( <tex-math notation="LaTeX">fprf </tex-math> ) of 10 and 20 kHz. The tensor velocities were obtained at a frame rate of 208.3 Hz, at <tex-math notation="LaTeX">fprf = 10 ~kHz </tex-math> , and the results from two velocity estimators were compared. The two estimators were the directional transverse oscillation (TO) cross correlation estimator and the proposed autocorrelation estimator. Linear regression between the actual and estimated velocity components yielded, for the cross correlation estimator, an <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R </tex-math> 2 value in the range of 0.89–0.91, 0.46–0.77, and 0.91–0.97 for the <tex-math notation="LaTeX">x </tex-math> -, <tex-math notation="LaTeX">y </tex-math> -, and <tex-math notation="LaTeX">z </tex-math> -components, and 0.87–0.89, 0.40–0.83, and 0.91–0.96 when using the autocorrelation estimator. The results demonstrate that an RCA can, with just 62 receive channels, measure complex 3-D flow fields at a high volume rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jørgensen et al. (2022) studied Carotid bifurcation flow (simulation). Row-column transverse oscillation tensor velocity imaging (cross-correlation estimator) vs. Auto-correlation estimator and Computational Fluid Dynamics reference was evaluated on Accuracy of 3-D velocity estimation (R-squared values). In simulated carotid bifurcation flow, a row-column addressed array using a cross-correlation estimator achieved R2 values of 0.89-0.91, 0.46-0.77, and 0.91-0.97 for x, y, and z velocity components.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: