Key result
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using 12.5 mm coil electrodes achieved a higher prevalence of continuous transmurality compared to 3 mm ring electrodes in an in vivo dog model.
Why the study?
Does an expanding loop catheter with coil electrodes improve the creation of continuous transmural linear atrial lesions compared to ring electrodes in normal dogs?
Does an expanding loop catheter with coil electrodes improve the creation of continuous transmural linear atrial lesions compared to ring electrodes in normal dogs?
In a canine model, expanding loop catheters with coil electrodes and sequential energy delivery are more effective than ring electrodes and simultaneous delivery for creating continuous transmural linear atrial lesions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coil electrodes may aid transmural lesion creation in preclinical models; leaves open translation to human AF ablation outcomes.
Atrial fibrillation is an arrhythmia that may potentially be treated by creating long linear lesions in the atria to create lines of electrical conduction block. While this has been performed with success with open-heart surgery, it has been proposed that a less invasive catheter-based approach could achieve similar success. Radiofrequency energy catheter ablation was performed in vivo with two novel electrode catheters. Each was an expanding loop design: one with 3 mm ring electrodes; and one with 12.5 mm coil electrodes. Power delivery was controlled automatically with temperature (70 degrees C target) feedback from thermistors embedded in each electrode. A total of 39 lines of ablation were created in the atria of 11 normal dogs. The coil electrodes were more effective in creating lesions than the ring electrodes with a similar prevalence of transmurality (89% vs. 85%) but a higher prevalence of continuous transmurality (35% vs. 5%). Sequential electrode energy delivery was better than simultaneous multipolar delivery due to varying efficiencies of tissue heating. Inadequate heating was observed in 47% of simultaneous versus 1% of sequential multipolar deliveries, and excessive heating in 6% versus 1% of cases, respectively. It is feasible to create linear atrial lesions with an expanding loop electrode catheter. Catheters with coil electrodes are more effective than those with ring electrodes. In order to avoid coagulum formation and inefficient heating, sequential electrode energy delivery is preferable to multipolar delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McRury et al. (1998) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=11). Radiofrequency energy catheter ablation with 12.5 mm coil electrodes vs. 3 mm ring electrodes was evaluated on Prevalence of continuous transmurality. Radiofrequency catheter ablation using 12.5 mm coil electrodes achieved a higher prevalence of continuous transmurality compared to 3 mm ring electrodes in an in vivo dog model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: