Key result
A novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter reduced radiofrequency time compared with focal ablation and eliminated gaps in lesions.
Why the study?
Does a novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter reduce radiofrequency time and improve lesion contiguity compared to focal ablation in healthy swine?
Does a novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter reduce radiofrequency time and improve lesion contiguity compared to focal ablation in healthy swine?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter safely delivers contiguous endocardial and epicardial lesions without gaps in significantly less time than sequential focal ablation in a swine model.
Background— A common strategy for ablation of scar-based ventricular tachycardia is delivering multiple lesions in a linear pattern. Methods and Results— We tested the efficacy of a novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter capable of creating linear lesions with a single application. Healthy swine underwent endocardial and epicardial linear ablation using a novel linear irrigated ablation catheter; control animals underwent focal lesions in a linear pattern over 3.5 cm with an irrigated radiofrequency catheter. The linear catheter contained 7 irrigated electrodes spaced over 3.5 cm and could deliver ≤25 W to each electrode. Linear ablation required significantly less radiofrequency time than focal ablation (56±11 versus 497±110 seconds; P <0.0001). At gross pathology, linear (n=18) epicardial lines were longer than focal (n=8) epicardial lines (3.3±0.7 versus 2.1±0.9 cm; P <0.0005), with greater volume (3.8±2.9 versus 1.5±1.6 cm 3 ; P =0.002). There was no difference between linear (n=22) and focal (n=7) endocardial line length or volume. Gaps (length 2.8±0.9 mm) were present in 53% of focal lines and 0% of linear ablation lines. No perforations, steam pops, or thrombus were noted. Conclusions— Compared with sequential focal radiofrequency ablation in a linear pattern, an irrigated multipolar linear ablation catheter safely delivers contiguous endocardial or epicardial lesions without gaps in a single ablation. This catheter shows promise for decreasing ventricular tachycardia ablation procedure time and improving outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazer et al. (2017) studied Healthy swine (ventricular tachycardia ablation model). Linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter vs. Sequential focal radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Radiofrequency time (seconds) (p=<0.0001). A novel linear irrigated multipolar ablation catheter reduced radiofrequency time compared with focal ablation and eliminated gaps in lesions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: