Why the study?
Does cilazapril improve left ventricular remodeling in patients with ischemic left ventricular failure after coronary intervention?
Does cilazapril improve left ventricular remodeling in patients with ischemic left ventricular failure after coronary intervention?
Cilazapril improves left ventricular ejection fraction and reduces left ventricular volumes when administered after coronary intervention in patients with ischemic heart failure.
May support cilazapril for post-PCI remodeling in ischemic HF; leaves open randomized confirmation.
Background and Objectives:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) is known to be effective in the prevention of left ventricular failure (LVF) after acute myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an ACEI, Cilazapril, on left ventricular remodeling in patients with ischemic LVF, who underwent coronary interventions. Materials and Methods:Cilazapril, 2.5-5.0 mg per day was administered 12 weeks after coronary interventions in 25 patients (18 M, 7 F, 61.5±9 years) with impaired LV function (ejection fraction≤50%). Fifteen patients (9 M, 6 F, 59.4±7 years) without ACEI were compared by clinical examinations, blood chemistry, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram with Cilzapril group at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention. Results:Blood pressure and heart rate were not changed after Cilazapril. LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) decreased from 153.1±38.7 to 135.6±25.5 ml and end-systolic volume from 84.9±34.7 to 72.6±25.1 ml after 12-week Cilazapril p=0.003, p=0.001. Ejection fraction (EF) was increased from 44.4±3.2 to 52.4± 2.8% after 12 weeks of Cilazapril p=0.034. In control group, LVEDV was changed from 152.7±44.6 to 143.6± 28.7 ml, which failed to show significant reduction. Side effects of Cilazapril were 3 dry cough (3/25, 12%) and 1 facial edema, 1 hypotension and 1 dizziness. Conclusion:Cilazapril is a beneficial adjunctive therapeutic agent in patients with ischemic left ventricular failure for the prevention of ventricular dilatation, especially after coronary intervention. (Korean Circulation J 1998;28(12):1964-1972)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: