Why the study?
Does low-dose hydrochlorothiazide provide similar blood pressure reduction with fewer adverse effects compared to high-dose hydrochlorothiazide in elderly men with hypertension?
Does low-dose hydrochlorothiazide provide similar blood pressure reduction with fewer adverse effects compared to high-dose hydrochlorothiazide in elderly men with hypertension?
Low-dose hydrochlorothiazide is nearly as effective as high-dose for treating hypertension in elderly men, but with a significantly lower risk of hypokalemia.
Low-dose hydrochlorothiazide is preferable in elderly hypertensive men; reinforces thiazide dose minimization in guidelines and future trials.
We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of antihypertensive drug regimens in 690 men past age 60 with diastolic blood pressure 90-114 mm Hg and systolic blood pressure less than 240 mm Hg. They received either a low (25-50 mg) or high (50-100 mg) dose of hydrochlorothiazide daily. Of 644 patients who completed the hydrochlorothiazide titration, 375 (58.2%) were responders (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 and less than or equal to 5 mm Hg below baseline) and 92.8% of these completed a 6-month maintenance period. Blood pressure was reduced from 157.6/98.5 mm Hg by 18.3/9.5 mm Hg with low dose hydrochlorothiazide and by 20.4/9.6 mm Hg with high dose hydrochlorothiazide; more patients achieved goal blood pressure with the high dose. Whites and blacks responded equally. Serum potassium less than 3.5 mmol/l occurred in 104 of 321 (32.3%) of the high dose versus 62 of 333 (18.6%) of the low dose hydrochlorothiazide patients. The 269 nonresponders to hydrochlorothiazide were randomly assigned in a double-blind study to receive hydralazine, methyldopa, metoprolol, or reserpine in addition to hydrochlorothiazide; 79.2% responded to the addition of the second drug and 87.3% of these completed a 6-month maintenance phase. Overall, there were no significant efficacy differences among the step 2 regimens. We conclude that the lower dose of hydrochlorothiazide was nearly as effective as the higher dose, and the addition of a second drug was effective and generally well tolerated in elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Materson et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: