Key result
Surgical mitral valve repair with ring annuloplasty significantly reduced the anatomical mitral valve orifice area from 1.1 to 0.2 cm2 at midsystole.
Why the study?
Does surgical mitral valve repair with ring annuloplasty acutely alter mitral valve geometry and anatomical orifice area in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=29)
No
Does surgical mitral valve repair with ring annuloplasty acutely alter mitral valve geometry and anatomical orifice area in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.2% vs 1.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Surgical mitral valve repair with ring annuloplasty acutely reduces annular dimensions and anatomical orifice area, successfully restoring mitral competency but eliminating physiologic systolic annular contractility.
Acute annular reduction supports restored competency; leaves open whether lost dynamics affect long-term durability.
Background The aim of this study was to quantify acute mitral valve (MV) geometry dynamic changes throughout the cardiac cycle using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) in patients undergoing surgical MV repair (MVR) with ring annuloplasty and optional neochord implantation. Methods Twenty-nine patients (63 ± 10 years) with severe primary mitral regurgitation underwent surgical MVR using ring annuloplasty with or without neochord implantation. We recorded 3D TEE data throughout the cardiac cycle before and after MVR. Dynamic changes (4D) in the MV annulus geometry and anatomical MV orifice area (AMVOA) were measured using a novel semiautomated software (Auto Valve, Siemens Healthcare). Results MVR significantly reduces the anteroposterior diameter by up to 38% at end-systole (36.8–22.7 mm; p < 0.001) and the lateromedial diameter by up to 31% (42.7–30.3 mm; p < 0.001). Moreover, the annular circumference was reduced by up to 31% at end-systole (129.6–87.6 mm, p < 0.001), and the annular area was significantly decreased by up to 52% (12.8–5.7 cm2; p < 0.001). Finally, the AMVOA experienced the largest change, decreasing from 1.1 to 0.2 cm2 during systole (at midsystole; p < 0.001) and from 4.1 to 3.2 cm2 (p < 0.001) during diastole. Conclusions MVR reduces the annular dimension and the AMVOA, contributing to mitral competency, but the use of annuloplasty rings reduces annular contractility after the procedure. Surgeons can use 4D imaging technology to assess MV function dynamically, detecting the acute morphological changes of the mitral annulus and leaflets before and after the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noack et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Severe primary mitral regurgitation (n=29). Surgical mitral valve repair with ring annuloplasty vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Anatomical mitral valve orifice area (AMVOA) at midsystole (p=<0.001). Surgical mitral valve repair with ring annuloplasty significantly reduced the anatomical mitral valve orifice area from 1.1 to 0.2 cm2 at midsystole.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: