Key result
VOM ethanol plus ablation linked to ~193% greater odds of AF/AT-free survival in HCM.
Why the study?
RFCA has low efficacy for persistent AF in patients with HCM, leaving the benefit of adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion unclear.
Does adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion added to radiofrequency catheter ablation improve survival without atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=102)
Yes
Does adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion added to radiofrequency catheter ablation improve survival without atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: OR 2.93 (95% CI 1.18-7.79)
Absolute Event Rate: 84.6% vs 65.2%
p-value: p=0.03
Adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion during radiofrequency catheter ablation significantly improves 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmias in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and persistent atrial fibrillation.
May support adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with persistent AF; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been shown to have low efficacy for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We conducted this study to evaluate the benefit of adjunctive vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion during RFCA for persistent AF (PsAF) in patients with non-obstructive HCM. Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study included 102 consecutive non-obstructive HCM patients with PsAF who underwent RFCA plus VOM ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) (RFCA + VOM, n = 56) or RFCA alone (RFCA, n = 46) for the first time. The efficacy endpoint was survival without AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) after the blanking period. Results: We completed the VOM-EI in 92.9% (52/56) patients. The left pulmonary vein antrum ablation time (RFCA + VOM: 19.9 ± 6.1 min vs. RFCA: 27.2 ± 9.3 min), mitral isthmus (MI) ablation time (RFCA + VOM: 16.9 ± 3.7 min vs. RFCA: 28.4 ± 7.8 min), and rate of coronary sinus (CS) vein ablation (RFCA + VOM: 57.69% vs. RFCA: 80.43%) were lower but the acute success rate of MI block (RFCA + VOM: 98.1% vs. RFCA: 84.8%) were higher in the RFCA + VOM group than those in the RFCA group (all p < 0.05). After twelve months follow-up, 84.6% of patients (44/52) survived without AF/AT in the RFCA + VOM group, compared to 65.2% of patients (30/46) in the RFCA group (p = 0.03; odds ratio = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.18–7.79). Conclusions: VOM-EI combined with RFCA decreased the recurrence rate of AF/AT at 12 months in HCM patients with PsAF. VOM-EI simplified the ablation of the left pulmonary vein antrum and MI and increased the success rate of MI bidirectional block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (n=102). Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) plus radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) alone was evaluated on Survival without atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia after the 3-month blanking period (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.18-7.79, p=0.03). Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion combined with radiofrequency catheter ablation increased 12-month survival without atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia to 84.6% compared to 65.2% with ablation alone in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and persistent atrial fibrillation (OR 2.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: