Key result
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement linked to ~44% lower systolic wall shear stress, comparable to normal.
Why the study?
Studies assessing flow-induced mechanical stress on aortic valve leaflets have been limited by a lack of appropriate imaging modalities.
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement normalize mechanical stress on the aortic valve leaflet in patients with an aneurysmal aortic root?
Observational (n=36)
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement normalize mechanical stress on the aortic valve leaflet in patients with an aneurysmal aortic root?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.52% vs 0.32%
p-value: p=<0.001
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement normalizes the elevated mechanical stress (wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index) on the aortic valve leaflet associated with an aneurysmal aortic root.
VSARR normalized leaflet WSS in aneurysmal roots; hypothesis-generating for durability benefits, warranting prospective trials.
AIMS: While mechanical stress caused by blood flow, e.g. wall shear stress (WSS), and related parameters, e.g. oscillatory shear index (OSI), are increasingly being recognized as key moderators of various cardiovascular diseases, studies on valves have been limited because of a lack of appropriate imaging modalities. We investigated the influence of aortic root geometry on WSS and OSI on the aortic valve (AV) leaflet. METHODS AND RESULTS: We applied our novel approach of intraoperative epi-aortic echocardiogram to measure the haemodynamic parameters of WSS and OSI on the AV leaflet. Thirty-six patients were included, which included those who underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) with no significant aortic regurgitation (n = 17) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with normal AV (n = 19). At baseline, those who underwent VSARR had a higher systolic WSS (0.52 ± 0.12 vs. 0.32 ± 0.08 Pa, respectively, P < 0.001) and a higher OSI (0.37 ± 0.06 vs. 0.29 ± 0.04, respectively, P < 0.001) on the aortic side of the AV leaflet than those who underwent CABG. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the size of the sinus of Valsalva had a significant association with WSS and OSI. Following VSARR, WSS and OSI values decreased significantly compared with the baseline values (WSS: 0.29 ± 0.12 Pa, P < 0.001; OSI: 0.26 ± 0.09, P < 0.001), and became comparable to the values in those who underwent CABG (WSS, P = 0.42; OSI, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical stress on the AV gets altered in correlation with the size of the aortic root. An aneurysmal aortic root may expose the leaflet to abnormal fluid dynamics. The VSARR procedure appeared to reduce these abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Aneurysmal aortic root (n=36). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) vs. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with normal aortic valve was evaluated on Systolic wall shear stress (WSS) on the aortic side of the aortic valve leaflet at baseline (p=<0.001). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement significantly reduced abnormal systolic wall shear stress on the aortic valve leaflet from 0.52 Pa to 0.29 Pa (P<0.001), comparable to normal valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: