Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider a <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mi>p</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> {(p,2)} -equation, that is, a nonlinear nonhomogeneous elliptic equation driven by the sum of a p -Laplacian and a Laplacian with <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>p</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {p>2} . The reaction term is <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>p</m:mi> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> {(p-1)} -linear, but exhibits asymmetric behavior at <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>±</m:mo> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {±∞} and at <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mn>0</m:mn> <m:mo>±</m:mo> </m:msup> </m:math> {0±} . Using variational tools, together with truncation and comparison techniques and Morse theory, we prove two multiplicity theorems, one of them providing sign information for all the solutions (positive, negative, nodal).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Παπαγεωργίου et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: