Key result
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality compared to control in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure (HR 0.87).
Why the study?
Does poly-parametric risk evaluation including LGE-CMR and genetic profiling improve patient selection for primary prevention ICDs in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does poly-parametric risk evaluation including LGE-CMR and genetic profiling improve patient selection for primary prevention ICDs in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
A poly-parametric approach incorporating LGE-CMR and genetic profiling is proposed to improve risk stratification and patient selection for primary prevention ICDs in dilated cardiomyopathy, moving beyond solely EF-based criteria.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Disertori et al. (2017) conducted an editorial in Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (n=1,116). Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) vs. No ICD was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68-1.12, p=0.28). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality compared to control in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure (HR 0.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: