Key result
This review summarizes contemporary evidence on patient selection, efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Does catheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
This review summarizes contemporary evidence regarding patient selection, efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with HFrEF.
Supports individualized ablation decisions in AF with HFrEF; leaves open optimal selection and long-term outcome confirmation.
Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are increasing in prevalence, and frequently coexist. Despite the desire to restore sinus rhythm in heart failure patients, large studies comparing rate control to pharmacologic rhythm control have failed to show superiority of either approach. This may in part be due to the inefficacy and higher risk of adverse effects with antiarrhythmic drugs in HF patients. As such, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has been increasingly explored as a treatment modality. We review the contemporary evidence regarding patient selection, efficacy, safety, and impact of catheter ablation on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malhi et al. (2018) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Catheter ablation was evaluated. This review summarizes contemporary evidence on patient selection, efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: