Key result
A greater decrease in QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy predicted a lower rate of LVAD, transplant, or death (Q1 vs Q4 HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.70; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Changes in left ventricular activation after CRT influence survival but are difficult to quantify noninvasively.
Does the change in QRS area (ΔQRSA) after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict the composite outcome of LVAD, cardiac transplant, or death?
Cohort (n=527)
Does the change in QRS area (ΔQRSA) after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict the composite outcome of LVAD, cardiac transplant, or death?
Effect estimate: HR 0.45 (95% CI 0.30-0.70)
p-value: p=<0.001
A greater reduction in QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is strongly associated with improved event-free survival, independent of baseline QRS morphology.
Background Changes in left ventricular (LV) activation after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) influence survival but are difficult to quantify noninvasively. Methods and Results We studied 527 CRT patients to assess whether noninvasive quantification of changes in LV activation, defined by change (Δ) in QRS area (QRSA), can predict outcomes after CRT. The study outcome was time until LV assist device(LVAD), cardiac transplant, or death. The three‐dimensional QRSA was measured from clinical 12 lead ECGs which were transformed into vectorcardiograms using the Kors method. QRSA was calculated as (QRSx 2 + QRSy 2 + QRSz 2 ) 1/2 ; ΔQRSA was calculated as post‐QRSA minus pre‐QRSA, where a negative value represents a reduction in LV activation delay. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to relate ΔQRSA area with outcomes after stratifying the population into quartiles of ΔQRSA. The median baseline QRSA of 93.6 µVs decreased to 59.7 µVs after CRT. Progressive reductions in QRSA with CRT were associated with a lower rate of LVAD, transplant, or death across patient quartiles ( P < .001). In Cox regression analyses, ΔQRSA was associated with outcomes independent of QRS morphology and other clinical variables (Q1[greatest decrease] vs Q4[smallest change=reference], HR 0.45, CI, 0.30‐0.70, P < .001). There was no interaction between ΔQRSA and QRS morphology. Conclusions CRT induced ΔQRSA was associated with clinically meaningful changes in event‐free survival. ΔQRSA may be a novel target to guide lead implantation and device optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friedman et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=527). Change in QRS area (ΔQRSA) after CRT vs. Smallest change in QRS area (Q4) was evaluated on Time until LV assist device (LVAD), cardiac transplant, or death (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.70, p=<0.001). A greater decrease in QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy predicted a lower rate of LVAD, transplant, or death (Q1 vs Q4 HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.70; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: