Key result
USA leads global heart failure biomarker research with 2,045 published documents.
Why the study?
Heart failure biomarkers are clinically important, and the study aimed to evaluate global research in this field to identify hot spots and perspectives for further advancement.
This bibliometric analysis maps the global research landscape of heart failure biomarkers, highlighting that while the field has matured, natriuretic peptides, cardiac fibrosis, and remodeling remain key areas of focus.
US leadership in HF biomarker output may inform targeted collaborations; leaves open questions of global research equity and translation.
Introduction: Heart failure is a rapidly growing public health problem and has become a major cause of hospitalization in middle-aged and older adults. Biomarkers are clinically important in managing heart failure and have attracted more attention from researchers in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the global research of heart failure biomarkers by bibliometrics and to identify the hot spots and perspectives for further advancement. Methods: Selection of relevant documents was from the Web of Science Core Collection. Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, SciMA, and CiteSpace software were used for bibliometric analysis. Results: respectively ranked first in terms of the number of publications and the number of co-citations. A total of 5,698 institutions from 90 countries participated in these publications, with the USA leading with 2,045 documents. The most productive institution was Harvard University. Januzzi, J.L. and Maisel, A.S. were the most productive and most cited authors respectively. Natriuretic peptide, copeptin, valsartan, ferric carboxymaltose, empagliflozin, preserved ejection fraction, myocardial fibrosis, and heart transplantation were hot themes. Conclusions: Extensive national and inter-institutional collaboration should be enhanced to bridge the gap between developed and less developed countries in heart failure biomarkers research. The research in this field seems to have reached a relatively mature stage, with a decrease in research fervor in recent years. The study of the natriuretic peptide family still has high centrality, with advances in the study of expression products and inflammatory markers. Cardiac fibrosis, cardiac remodeling, and therapies regarding heart failure have become hot spots.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2023) studied Heart failure. A bibliometric analysis of heart failure biomarkers across 5,698 institutions from 90 countries identified the USA as the leading contributor with 2,045 documents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: