Key result
Esaxerenone is linked to lower BP and NT-proBNP, with ~30% of pre-HFpEF improving to stage A.
Why the study?
HFpEF presents therapeutic challenges exacerbated by comorbidities, and the selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist esaxerenone may offer benefits in managing the HFpEF continuum.
Does esaxerenone improve blood pressure and cardiac function in hypertensive patients with HFpEF or pre-HFpEF?
Observational
No
Does esaxerenone improve blood pressure and cardiac function in hypertensive patients with HFpEF or pre-HFpEF?
Esaxerenone may effectively manage the heart failure continuum, with particular benefit in improving cardiac function and potentially decelerating disease progression in pre-HFpEF patients.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) presents significant therapeutic challenges, particularly exacerbated by comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. The modulation of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System is critical in managing HFpEF progression. Esaxerenone (ESAX), a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, may offer benefits in managing HFpEF continuum due to its unique mechanism. METHODS: Conducted at Odawara Municipal Hospital, this single-center, prospective, observational study involved hypertensive adult outpatients diagnosed with either type 2 diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease. Patients were categorized into HFpEF and pre-HFpEF groups based on established criteria. The study primarily assessed changes in blood pressure and cardiac function (through NT-proBNP levels and echocardiography), along with secondary outcomes including aortic stiffness and oxidative stress over a 24-week period. RESULTS: Both HFpEF and pre-HFpEF patients exhibited significant reductions in blood pressure, with no significant differences between the patients. HFpEF patients experienced decreases in NT-proBNP levels and oxidative stress similar to those in pre-HFpEF patients. Notably, pre-HFpEF patients demonstrated more pronounced improvements in cardiac function, particularly in the E/e' ratio and global longitudinal strain, compared to HFpEF patients. Additionally, 30% of pre-HFpEF patients had improved to stage A, suggesting potential for early intervention. CONCLUSIONS: ESAX appears to be effective in managing the heart failure continuum, particularly benefiting pre-HFpEF patients. Its impacts suggest the potential benefits of early intervention in decelerating disease progression and potentially preventing the new onset of HFpEF, highlighting the importance of targeted therapies at early stages of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naruke et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and pre-HFpEF. Esaxerenone vs. HFpEF vs pre-HFpEF was evaluated on Changes in blood pressure and cardiac function (through NT-proBNP levels and echocardiography). Esaxerenone treatment over 24 weeks reduced blood pressure and NT-proBNP in both HFpEF and pre-HFpEF patients, with 30% of pre-HFpEF patients improving to stage A.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: