Key result
Polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stents in a real-world PCI registry demonstrated a 390-day incidence of 13.1% for patient-oriented and 7.1% for device-oriented composite endpoints.
Why the study?
Following trial evidence establishing the clinical profile of polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stents with 1-month DAPT in high bleeding risk patients, real-world patterns of indications, DAPT strategies, and outcomes remained to be evaluated.
Observational (n=858)
Yes
In a real-world registry, the use of polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stents, often followed by a one-month DAPT regimen, demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in a predominantly high bleeding risk population.
Supports abbreviated DAPT with polymer-free stents in high-bleeding-risk PCI patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
AIMS: A large trial established the favourable clinical profile of a new polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES) with a one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We aimed to evaluate the real-world patterns of indications, DAPT strategies and outcomes for the PF-BES following this evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS: CHANCE is a multicentre registry including all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one PF-BES. The reasons for the PF-BES PCI and planned antithrombotic regimens were collected. Primary outcomes were the 390-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient-oriented and device-oriented composite endpoints (POCE: death, myocardial infarction [MI] or target vessel revascularisation [TVR]; DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel MI or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR]). Between January 2016 and July 2018, 858 patients (age 74±10 years, 64.6% male, 58.7% acute coronary syndrome presentation) underwent PF-BES PCI. The main reasons for the physicians' choice of PF-BES reflected a perceived HBR in 77.7% of patients. One-month DAPT was planned in 40.3% of patients. At 390-day follow-up (median 340 days, interquartile range: 187-390 days), the estimated incidence of POCE was 13.1% (any MI 3.7%, any TVR 3.4%) and of DOCE was 7.1% (TV-MI 3.6%, ID-TLR 1.4%), while the 390-day estimate of any bleeding event was 11.1% (BARC 3-5 bleeding 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In a large all-comers registry, PF-BES was used mostly in HBR patients, frequently followed by a very short DAPT regimen. The reported outcomes suggest a favourable safety and efficacy profile for the PF-BES in a real-world clinical setting. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03622203.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Ascenzo et al. (2020) conducted an observational in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=858). Polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES) was evaluated on 390-day patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE: death, MI, or TVR) and device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel MI, or ID-TLR). Polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stents in a real-world PCI registry demonstrated a 390-day incidence of 13.1% for patient-oriented and 7.1% for device-oriented composite endpoints.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: