Key result
Higher metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score linked to ~98% greater mortality risk per point in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Metabolic disorder, malnutrition, and inflammation interact in HFpEF mechanisms, prompting the construction of a Metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score to predict mortality risk.
Does a Metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) predict all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF?
Cohort (n=1,083)
No
Does a Metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) predict all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF?
A novel risk score incorporating 6 metabolic, nutritional, and inflammatory biomarkers effectively predicts all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF.
BACKGROUND: Metabolic disorder, malnutrition and inflammation are involved and interplayed in the mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to construct a Metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) to predict the risk of death in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with HFpEF and without infective or systemic disease. 20 biomarkers were filtered by the Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso)-Cox regression. 1000 times bootstrapping datasets were generated to select biomarkers that appeared above 95% frequency in repetitions to construct the MIS. RESULTS: Among 1083 patients diagnosed with HFpEF, 342 patients (31.6%) died during a median follow-up period of 2.5 years. The MIS was finally constructed based on 6 biomarkers, they were albumin (ALB), red blood cell distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), lymphocytes, triiodothyronine (T3) and uric acid (UA). Incorporating MIS into the basic predictive model significantly increased both discrimination (∆C-index = 0.034, 95% CI 0.013-0.050) and reclassification (IDI, 6.6%, 95% CI 4.0%-9.5%; NRI, 22.2% 95% CI 14.4%-30.2%) in predicting all-cause mortality. In the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the mean area under the curve (AUC) for the MIS was 0.778, 0.782 and 0.772 at 1, 3, and 5 years after discharge in the cross-validation sets. The MIS was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.98, 95% CI [1.70-2.31], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A risk score derived from 6 commonly used inflammatory, nutritional, thyroid and uric acid metabolic biomarkers can effectively identify high-risk patients with HFpEF, providing potential individualized management strategies for patients with HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=1,083). Metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) vs. Basic predictive model was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.70-2.31, p=<0.001). The Metabolism-malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) was independently associated with all-cause mortality in HFpEF patients (HR 1.98 per 1-point increase).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: