Why the study?
Is epicardial pacer lead implantation using local anaesthesia safe and effective for long-term cardiac pacing in patients with symptomatic heart block?
Is epicardial pacer lead implantation using local anaesthesia safe and effective for long-term cardiac pacing in patients with symptomatic heart block?
Epicardial pacer lead implantation using local anaesthesia, particularly on the left ventricle, provides effective long-term pacing for symptomatic heart block.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support epicardial pacing under local anesthesia in heart block; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Experience with a simple method of epicardialintramural pacer lead implantation on either ventricle using local anaesthesia for long term cardiac pacing in cases of symptomatic heart block is presented. The report concerns 40 patients with 41 implants. The follow-up period was 6–19 months. There were 3 operative deaths. One of the deaths was coincidental and the other 2 were attributed to bad selection. Early electrode failure due to the development of an exit block occurred in 1 case; he has done well after his right ventricular electrode was transferred to the left ventricle through the same incision using local anaesthesia. There has been no late electrode failure. Nearly all the survivors have obtained excellent results. The distinct advantages offered by this technique of epicardial pacing are discussed. The modification which has been introduced in extending the scope of pacer lead implantation to the left ventricle has increased the usefulness of the technique. Left ventricular placement of the electrode assures better intramural pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guharay et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: