Key result
RAMP group education with home monitoring increases BP control rates by ~116% vs usual care.
Why the study?
Although the Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) reduces blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in hypertension, it was unknown how blood pressure control compares between RAMP group and RAMP individual care.
Does a multi-disciplinary group education and home blood pressure monitoring program improve blood pressure control in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension compared to individual usual care?
RCT (n=291)
Open-label
cluster-randomized
Yes
Does a multi-disciplinary group education and home blood pressure monitoring program improve blood pressure control in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension compared to individual usual care?
Absolute Event Rate: 78.9% vs 36.5%
p-value: p=< .001
A multi-disciplinary group education program with home blood pressure monitoring significantly improved blood pressure control rates compared to individual usual care in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Supports group education with home BP monitoring for older patients with uncontrolled hypertension; extends RCT evidence for multidisciplinary primary care models.
The Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) has successfully demonstrated a reduction of blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular (CVD) risk of patients with hypertension. This study aimed to compare the blood pressure control rate of participants after attended RAMP group, with those attended RAMP individual from usual care. A prospective open cluster-randomized controlled trial was performed in five public primary care clinics. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited. RAMP group consisted of multi-disciplinary group education on knowledge of hypertension, lifestyle modification, and hands-on home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) training. Each participant was given a branchial HBPM device. An individual face-to-face nurse follow-up was arranged 6 weeks later. Participants' office BP and clinical parameters were assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Three RAMP group and two RAMP-individual clusters recruited 152 and 139 participants, respectively. The mean age was 67.0 (SD 9.9) year. After 18 months of treatment, there was a significantly higher BP control rate in the RAMP-group participants than the RAMP-individual participants (78.9% vs 36.5%, P < .001). The systolic BP was reduced by 19.7 mm Hg (95% CI -22.03, -17.40, P < .001) and diastolic BP by 8.1 mm Hg (95% CI -9.66, -6.61, P < .001) in RAMP group while the RAMP individual demonstrated 9.3 mm Hg (95% CI -12.1, -6.4, P < .001) reduction in systolic BP without any significant difference in diastolic BP. The RAMP-group participants' body weight (BW) and body mass index(BMI) had no significant changes, while the RAMP-individual participants had a significant increase in BW and BMI. No adverse effect was reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in uncontrolled hypertension (n=291). RAMP group (multi-disciplinary group education, lifestyle modification, and hands-on home blood pressure monitoring training) vs. RAMP individual from usual care was evaluated on blood pressure control rate (p=< .001). RAMP group education with home blood pressure monitoring significantly improved the blood pressure control rate compared to individual usual care (78.9% vs 36.5%, P < .001) at 18 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: