Key result
MRI-derived mildly reduced LVEF linked to ~266% higher AHF readmission risk in elderly patients.
Why the study?
Patients with STEMI, particularly elderly individuals, face an increased risk of readmission for acute heart failure.
Does MRI-derived LVEF predict readmission for acute heart failure differently in elderly versus nonelderly patients after STEMI?
Cohort (n=759)
Yes
Does MRI-derived LVEF predict readmission for acute heart failure differently in elderly versus nonelderly patients after STEMI?
Effect estimate: HR 3.66 (95% CI 1.54-8.68)
MRI-derived mildly reduced LVEF identifies an increased risk of heart failure readmission specifically in elderly STEMI patients, whereas reduced LVEF predicts risk regardless of age.
May flag higher AHF readmission risk in elderly post-STEMI patients; leaves open whether MRI-LVEF adds value beyond clinical predictors.
BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), especially elderly individuals, have an increased risk of readmission for acute heart failure (AHF). PURPOSE: To study the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by MRI to predict AHF in elderly (>70 years) and nonelderly patients after STEMI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Multicenter registry of 759 reperfused STEMI patients (23.3% elderly). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5-T. Balanced steady-state free precession (cine imaging) and segmented inversion recovery steady-state free precession (late gadolinium enhancement) sequences. ASSESSMENT: One-week MRI-derived LVEF (%) was quantified. Sequential MRI data were recorded in 579 patients. Patients were categorized according to their MRI-derived LVEF as preserved (p-LVEF, ≥50%), mildly reduced (mr-LVEF, 41%-49%), or reduced (r-LVEF, ≤40%). Median follow-up was 5 [2.33-7.54] years. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariable (Student's t, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests) and multivariable (Cox proportional hazard regression) comparisons and continuous-time multistate Markov model to analyze transitions between LVEF categories and to AHF. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Over the follow-up period, 79 (10.4%) patients presented AHF. MRI-LVEF was the most robust predictor in nonelderly (HR 0.94 [0.91-0.98]) and elderly patients (HR 0.94 [0.91-0.97]). Elderly patients had an increased AHF risk across the LVEF spectrum. An excess of risk (compared to p-LVEF) was noted in patients with r-LVEF both in nonelderly (HR 11.25 [5.67-22.32]) and elderly patients (HR 7.55 [3.29-17.34]). However, the mr-LVEF category was associated with increased AHF risk only in elderly patients (HR 3.66 [1.54-8.68]). Less transitions to higher LVEF states (n = 19, 30.2% vs. n = 98, 53%) and more transitions to AHF state (n = 34, 53.9% vs. n = 45, 24.3%) were observed in elderly than nonelderly patients. DATA CONCLUSION: MRI-derived p-LVEF confers a favorable prognosis and r-LVEF identifies individuals at the highest risk of AHF in both elderly and nonelderly patients. Nevertheless, an excess of risk was also found in the mr-LVEF category in the elderly group. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcos‐Garcés et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=759). MRI-derived left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) vs. Preserved LVEF (≥50%) was evaluated on Acute heart failure (AHF) (HR 3.66, 95% CI 1.54-8.68). MRI-derived mildly reduced LVEF (41%-49%) was associated with an increased risk of acute heart failure readmission in elderly patients (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.54-8.68) compared to preserved LVEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: