Why the study?
Elderly patients with STEMI represent a very high-risk population, but data on the prognostic value of CMR in this setting are scarce.
Does early cardiac magnetic resonance improve the prediction of major adverse cardiac events in elderly patients after STEMI?
Population
247 patients over 70 years of age discharged for a first STEMI treated with percutaneous intervention
Comparison
Additional prognostic value of CMR variables compared to baseline and echocardiographic characteristics
Design
Prospective multicenter registry
Follow-up
4.8-year mean
Key result
Early cardiac magnetic resonance significantly improved the prediction of major adverse cardiac events when added to baseline and echocardiographic models (C-statistic 0.759 vs 0.685; P<0.001).
Authors
Loading...
Early CMR may enhance post-MI risk stratification beyond echocardiography; extends existing models with incremental prognostic value.
Cohort (n=247)
Yes
Does early cardiac magnetic resonance improve the prediction of major adverse cardiac events in elderly patients after STEMI?
Effect estimate: C-statistic 0.759 (95% CI 0.694-0.824)
p-value: p=<0.001
Early CMR provides significant incremental prognostic value over clinical and echocardiographic parameters for predicting MACE in elderly patients following STEMI.
Garces et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=247). Early (1-week) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) vs. Baseline and echocardiographic characteristics was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (C-statistic 0.759, 95% CI 0.694-0.824, p=<0.001). Early cardiac magnetic resonance significantly improved the prediction of major adverse cardiac events when added to baseline and echocardiographic models (C-statistic 0.759 vs 0.685; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: