Why the study?
Does hormone therapy improve the clinical course and prevent residual cardiac damage in patients with active rheumatic carditis compared to symptomatic therapy?
Does hormone therapy improve the clinical course and prevent residual cardiac damage in patients with active rheumatic carditis compared to symptomatic therapy?
Hormone therapy rapidly arrests the signs and symptoms of active rheumatic carditis and significantly reduces the incidence of residual cardiac damage compared to standard symptomatic therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support hormone therapy in acute rheumatic carditis; hypothesis-generating observational data requiring randomized confirmation.
• The course of rheumatic carditis in 100 patients treated with digitalis, salicylates, sedation, and symptomatic therapy was compared with its course in 55 patients treated with the hormones corticotropin, cortisone, and hydrocortisone. The three hormones were equally effective. In all patients so treated, the signs and symptoms of active carditis were arrested within 24 to 72 hours, and in the majority of patients enlarged chambers were reduced to normal and new precordial murmurs had regressed by the third to seventh day. A difference was found between the favorable results in the hormone-treated group and the protracted illness with residual cardiac damage seen in every patient in the contratest group. There was no overt evidence of residual damage in 84% of the patients who were having their first attack of carditis and who were treated with hormones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May G. Wilson (1956) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: