Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation plus optimal medical therapy yielded 5.26 QALYs versus 4.00 QALYs for optimal medical therapy alone, resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of £16,405.
Why the study?
Is cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy cost-effective compared to optimal medical therapy alone in heart failure patients with normal QRS?
Is cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy cost-effective compared to optimal medical therapy alone in heart failure patients with normal QRS?
Effect estimate: ICER £16,405 per QALY
Absolute Event Rate: 5.26% vs 4%
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy appears to be a cost-effective treatment option for heart failure patients with normal QRS who remain symptomatic on optimal medical therapy in the UK.
CCM may be cost-effective for symptomatic normal-QRS HF; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background: Heart failure represents a major burden for health systems and societies. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy was developed in recent years for patients with normal QRS in whom optimal pharmacological (OMT) treatment has failed to control symptoms adequately. This study presents an economic evaluation of CCM therapy for the UK. Methods: A Markov model was built to simulate the management of patients under two therapy scenarios, on OMT alone and CCM+OMT respectively. The horizon is the patient’s life time and the cycle is 4 weeks. The model estimates life year (LYs), quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and overall treatment costs. Data to populate it came from relevant CCM trials, the literature and other sources. Results: The total mean life-time cost was £37,467 in the CCM+OMT arm and £16,885 in the OMT arm. Patients in the OMT arm gained 7.00 LYs and 4.00 QALYs and those on CCM+OMT 7.96 and 5.26 respectively. The incremental cost per QALY was £16,405and the incremental cost per LY £21,415. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the results are pretty stable and stochastic analysis indicates that at a £30,000 per QALY threshold the likelihood of CCM+OMT being cost-effective is 99.8% and at £25,000 per QALY 97%. Conclusion: The present analysis indicates that CCM may be cost-effective therapy. This early conclusion should be viewed in the light of the caveats of the modeling methods used, due to data availability. Long-term studies directly collecting hospitalization and mortality data should be undertaken to provide more robust evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maniadakis et al. (2015) studied Heart failure. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy + optimal pharmacological treatment (OMT) vs. Optimal pharmacological treatment (OMT) alone was evaluated on Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) (ICER £16,405 per QALY). Cardiac contractility modulation plus optimal medical therapy yielded 5.26 QALYs versus 4.00 QALYs for optimal medical therapy alone, resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of £16,405.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: