Key result
Acoustic quantification identified abnormal left ventricular filling in 22 patients with mild hypertension whose Doppler echocardiography parameters were normal.
Why the study?
Does acoustic quantification improve the detection of early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared to Doppler echocardiography in patients with arterial hypertension?
Observational (n=83)
Does acoustic quantification improve the detection of early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction compared to Doppler echocardiography in patients with arterial hypertension?
Acoustic quantification may be superior to standard Doppler echocardiography for detecting early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with mild arterial hypertension.
May aid early detection of diastolic dysfunction missed by Doppler in mild hypertension; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
We compared acoustic quantification (AQ) to Doppler echocardiography (DE) in the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling in 41 hypertensives and 42 controls. In hypertensives, DE showed reduced ratios of early to late diastolic velocity, AQ revealed reduced peak to late filling rate ratios, and both techniques found prolonged acceleration times indicating abnormal filling. In 22 patients with mild hypertension and less LV hypertrophy, however, all DE filling parameters were normal. In these patients AQ indicated prolonged acceleration times and early filling times. In conclusion, AQ is useful for the identification of abnormal LV filling in arterial hypertension and might be superior to DE in detection of early diastolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muscholl et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Arterial hypertension (n=83). Acoustic quantification (AQ) vs. Doppler echocardiography (DE) was evaluated on Left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling. Acoustic quantification identified abnormal left ventricular filling in 22 patients with mild hypertension whose Doppler echocardiography parameters were normal.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: