Key result
Cardiac MRI ejection fraction assessments had a coefficient of repeatability of 2.8% to 10.0% across different scanners, while left ventricular mass CoR ranged from 7.8 g to 39.5 g.
Why the study?
Does the use of different MRI scanners, time-points, and observers affect the reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction and mass assessments in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=15)
Yes
Does the use of different MRI scanners, time-points, and observers affect the reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction and mass assessments in healthy volunteers?
Ejection fraction measurements are reproducible across different MRI scanners and time-points, but left ventricular mass is highly susceptible to interobserver variation, which must be accounted for in multicenter trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EF assessments show acceptable repeatability across scanners; LV mass variability leaves open need for standardized protocols in multicenter trials.
PURPOSE: To derive reproducibility assessments of ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular mass (LVM) from short-axis cardiac MR images acquired at single and multiple time-points on different 1.5T scanner models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of 15 healthy volunteers were acquired twice using a Magnetom Avanto scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and once using a Signa Excite scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) over four months, and analyzed using ARGUS and MASS Analysis+ software, respectively. Two physicists independently segmented the myocardial borders in order to derive intra- and interobserver assessments of EF and LVM for single and multiple time-points on the same and different scanners. RESULTS: For EF, the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) increased as different observers, multiple time-points, and different scanners were introduced. The CoR ranged from 2.8% (intraobserver measurements, single time-point, same scanner) to 10.0% (interobserver measurements, different time-points, different scanners). For LVM, intraobserver CoR parameters were consistently smaller than interobserver values. The CoR ranged from 7.8 g (intraobserver measurements, single time-point, same scanner) to 39.5 g (interobserver measurements, different time-points, different scanners). CONCLUSION: Reproducible EF data can be obtained at single or multiple time-points using different scanners. However, LVM is notably susceptible to interobserver variation, and this should be carefully considered if similar evaluations are planned as part of multicenter or longitudinal investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gandy et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=15). Cardiac MRI on different 1.5T scanners vs. Same scanner was evaluated on Reproducibility (coefficient of repeatability) of ejection fraction and left ventricular mass. Cardiac MRI ejection fraction assessments had a coefficient of repeatability of 2.8% to 10.0% across different scanners, while left ventricular mass CoR ranged from 7.8 g to 39.5 g.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: