Key result
Combined high congestion index and plasma volume linked to ~320% higher in-hospital mortality in AHF.
Why the study?
Pulmonary and intravascular congestion both contribute to urgent hospitalization and death in HF, and combining radiographic congestion with plasma volume might screen high-risk patients in the ED.
Does the combination of high congestion score index and high estimated plasma volume status predict in-hospital mortality in patients admitted for acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=252)
No
Does the combination of high congestion score index and high estimated plasma volume status predict in-hospital mortality in patients admitted for acute heart failure?
The combination of radiographic congestion score index and estimated plasma volume status significantly improves the prediction of in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid acute HF risk stratification beyond routine markers; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) often display dyspnea associated with pulmonary congestion, along with intravascular congestion, both may result in urgent hospitalization and subsequent death. A combination of radiographic pulmonary congestion and plasma volume might screen patients with a high risk of in-hospital mortality in the emergency department (ED). Methods: In the pathway of dyspneic patients in emergency (PARADISE) cohort, patients admitted for acute HF were stratified into 4 groups based on high or low congestion score index (CSI, ranging from 0 to 3, high value indicating severe congestion) and estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) calculated from hemoglobin/hematocrit. Results: In a total of 252 patients (mean age, 81.9 years; male, 46.8%), CSI and ePVS were not correlated (Spearman rho <0 .10, p > 0.10). High CSI/high ePVS was associated with poorer renal function, but clinical congestion markers (i.e., natriuretic peptide) were comparable across CSI/ePVS categories. High CSI/high ePVS was associated with a four-fold higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted-OR, 95%CI = 4.20, 1.10-19.67) compared with low CSI/low ePVS, whereas neither high CSI nor ePVS alone was associated with poor prognosis (all- p -value > 0.10; P interaction = 0.03). High CSI/high ePVS improved a routine risk model (i.e., natriuretic peptide and lactate)(NRI = 46.9%, p = 0.02), resulting in high prediction of risk of in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.85, 0.82-0.89). Conclusion: In patients hospitalized for acute HF with relatively old age and comorbidity burdens, a combination of CSI and ePVS was associated with a risk of in-hospital death, and improved prognostic performance on top of a conventional risk model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute Heart Failure (n=252). High Congestion Score Index (CSI) and High estimated Plasma Volume Status (ePVS) vs. Low CSI and Low ePVS was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.10-19.67, p=0.048). The combination of high congestion score index and high estimated plasma volume status was associated with a four-fold higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 4.20) compared to low values in patients with acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: