Why the study?
Data are limited regarding the association between estimated plasma volume status determined using hemoglobin/hematocrit data and outcomes in patients with stable chronic heart failure.
Does higher estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) predict increased risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization in patients with stable chronic systolic heart failure?
Does higher estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) predict increased risk of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization in patients with stable chronic systolic heart failure?
Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) derived from hemoglobin and hematocrit is an independent prognostic marker for mortality and rehospitalization in patients with stable chronic systolic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ePVS may aid risk stratification in stable systolic HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Assessing congestion is challenging but important to patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, there are limited data regarding the association between estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) determined using hemoglobin/hematocrit data and outcomes in patients with stable CHF. We prospectively analyzed 231 patients; the median follow-up period was 35.6 months. We calculated ePVS at admission using the Duarte and Strauss formula, derived from hemoglobin and hematocrit ratios and divided patients into three groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization. Among 274 patients (61.98 years of age, 2.3% male), the mean ePVS was 3.98±0.90 dL/g. The third ePVS tertile had a higher proportion of primary outcome (71.4%) than the first or second tertile (48.1% and 59.7%, respectively; p=0.013). On multivariable Cox analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, higher ePVS remained significantly associated with increased rate of primary outcome (adjusted HR 1.567, 95% CI 1.267 to 1.936; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that the occurrence of primary outcome, all-cause mortality and rehospitalization increased progressively from first to third tertiles (p=0.006, 0.014 and 0.001; respectively). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve of ePVS for primary outcome was 0.645. ePVS determined using hemoglobin and hematocrit was independently associated with clinical outcomes for patients with stable CHF. Our study thus further strengthens the evidence that ePVS has important prognostic value in patients with stable CHF. Trial registration number ChiCTR-ONC-14004463.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: