Key result
High estimated plasma volume status (ePVS ≥ 5.28 mL/g) at admission was significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.09).
Why the study?
Estimated plasma volume status correlates with poor prognosis in heart failure, but its association with outcomes in acute myocardial infarction had not been investigated.
Does high estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) predict increased in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,534)
No
Does high estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) predict increased in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Higher estimated plasma volume status (ePVS ≥ 5.28 mL/g), easily calculated from routine hemoglobin and hematocrit, is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests admission plasma volume may serve as a prognostic marker in acute MI; leaves open whether.
BACKGROUND: Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) has been reported that associated with poor prognosis in heart failure patients. However, no researchinvestigated the association of ePVS and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, we aimed to determine the association between ePVS and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We extracted AMI patients data from MIMIC-III database. A generalized additive model and logistic regression model were used to demonstrate the association between ePVS levels and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to pooled the in-hospital mortality between the various group. ROC curve analysis were used to assessed the discrimination of ePVS for predicting in-hospital mortality. 1534 eligible subjects (1004 males and 530 females) with an average age of 67.36 ± 0.36 years old were included in our study finally. 136 patients (73 males and 63 females) died in hospital, with the prevalence of in-hospital mortality was 8.9%. The result of the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the high-ePVS group (ePVS ≥ 5.28 mL/g) had significant lower survival possibility in-hospital admission compared with the low-ePVS group (ePVS < 5.28 mL/g). In the unadjusted model, high-level of ePVS was associated with higher OR (1.09; 95% CI 1.06-1.12; P < 0.001) compared with low-level of ePVS. After adjusted the vital signs data, laboratory data, and treatment, high-level of ePVS were also associated with increased OR of in-hospital mortality, 1.06 (95% CI 1.03-1.09; P < 0.001), 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.08; P = 0.009), 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07; P = 0.023), respectively. The ROC curve indicated that ePVS has acceptable discrimination for predicting in-hospital mortality. The AUC value was found to be 0.667 (95% CI 0.653-0.681). CONCLUSION: Higher ePVS values, calculated simply from Duarte's formula (based on hemoglobin/hematocrit) was associated with poor prognosis in AMI patients. EPVS is a predictor for predicting in-hospital mortality of AMI, and could help refine risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,534). High estimated plasma volume status (ePVS ≥ 5.28 mL/g) vs. Low estimated plasma volume status (ePVS < 5.28 mL/g) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.12, p=<0.001). High estimated plasma volume status (ePVS ≥ 5.28 mL/g) at admission was significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.09).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: