Key result
Postoperative day 6 TAT/PIC ratio predicts VTE after joint arthroplasty with ~97% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is a common complication after joint arthroplasty, prompting the evaluation of coagulation and fibrinolysis markers to identify potential biomarkers for predicting postoperative VTE.
Does the TAT/PIC ratio predict venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?
Cohort (n=83)
No
Does the TAT/PIC ratio predict venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?
The TAT/PIC ratio on postoperative day 6 demonstrates high sensitivity and negative predictive value, making it a potential early prognostic biomarker for VTE after joint arthroplasty.
May aid postoperative VTE risk stratification after arthroplasty; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
One common complication after joint arthroplasty is venous thromboembolism (VTE). Therefore, it is essential to measure the changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis in order to predict VTE among patients who underwent joint arthroplasty. This study aimed to identify potential useful biomarkers for prognosing to VTE. This was a prospective cohort study enrolling 83 patients who underwent joint arthroplasty. The levels of d-dimer, thrombin–antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin–α2-antiplasmin complex (PIC), soluble thrombomodulin, and tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor complex were measured on day 0 (before surgery) and days 1, 3, and 6 after surgery. Ultrasound examination was used to diagnose VTE on preoperative day 0 and postoperative day 6. A total of 35 patients developed VTE after surgery. Patients with VTE exhibited significantly higher levels of d-dimer and TAT on postoperative days 3 and 6 (all P < .05). The area under curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were 0.65 and 0.68 and 0.68 and 0.74 for d-dimer and TAT levels on postoperative days 3 and 6, respectively. The level of TAT/PIC ratio on postoperative day 6 was significantly increased among patients with VTE compared to non-VTE patients ( P < .0001). In addition, the AUC of ROC, cutoff level, sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of TAT/PIC ratio were 0.78, 4.03 ng/TU, 97.14%, 33.33%, 51.52%, and 94.12%, respectively. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of TAT/PIC ratio make it a potential prognostic index for diagnosing VTE during the early phase of postoperative joint arthroplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Postoperative venous thromboembolism in total joint arthroplasty (n=83). TAT/PIC ratio vs. Non-VTE patients was evaluated on Prediction of postoperative venous thromboembolism using TAT/PIC ratio on day 6 (AUC 0.78, p=<0.0001). The TAT/PIC ratio on postoperative day 6 significantly predicted venous thromboembolism after joint arthroplasty with an area under the curve of 0.78, a sensitivity of 97.14%, and a negative predictive value of 94.12%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: