Why the study?
Do measurements of F1+2, TAT, and D-dimer accurately rule out postoperative DVT in patients undergoing total hip replacement under antithrombotic prophylaxis?
Population
159 patients undergoing total hip replacement under antithrombotic prophylaxis
Comparison
Measurement of prothrombin fragment 1+2… vs Bilateral venography performed 8-11 days after…
Design
Cohort, randomized (parent trial), double-blind (parent trial)
Follow-up
8-11 days after surgery
Authors
Loading...
F1+2 and D-dimer lack adequate sensitivity to exclude postoperative DVT; leaves open whether alternative markers improve rule-out accuracy under prophylaxis.
Do measurements of F1+2, TAT, and D-dimer accurately rule out postoperative DVT in patients undergoing total hip replacement under antithrombotic prophylaxis?
Measurements of F1+2, TAT, and D-dimer lack sufficient sensitivity and negative predictive value to safely rule out DVT in patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis after total hip replacement.
Cofrancesco et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: