Key result
Dapagliflozin proves highly cost-effective for HFmrEF and HFpEF across three European healthcare systems.
Why the study?
To determine the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin added to usual care in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction for UK, German, and Spanish payers.
Is dapagliflozin added to usual care cost-effective in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Is dapagliflozin added to usual care cost-effective in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Dapagliflozin is a cost-effective treatment option when added to usual care for patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF in European healthcare systems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support dapagliflozin consideration in European HFmrEF/HFpEF; leaves open real-world validation beyond modeled scenarios.
AIMS: To determine the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin, added to usual care, in patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction for the UK, German and Spanish payers using detailed patient-level data from the Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVEs of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure (DELIVER) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A lifetime Markov state-transition cohort model was developed. Quartiles of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ-TSS) defined health states and monthly transition count data informed transition probabilities. Multivariable generalized estimating equations captured the incidence of HF hospitalizations and urgent HF visits, while cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality were estimated using adjusted parametric survival models. Health state costs were assigned to KCCQ-TSS quartiles (2021 British pound [GBP]/Euro) and patient-reported outcomes were sourced from DELIVER. Future values of costs and effects were discounted according to country-specific rates. In the UK, dapagliflozin treatment was predicted to increase quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years by 0.231 and 0.354, respectively, and extend the time spent in the best quartile of KCCQ-TSS by 4.2 months. Comparable outcomes were projected for Germany and Spain. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were £7761, €9540 and €5343/QALY in the UK, Germany and Spain, respectively. According to regional willingness-to-pay thresholds, 91%, 89% and 92% of simulations in the UK, Germany and Spain, respectively, were cost-effective following probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin, added to usual care, is very likely cost-effective for HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction in several European countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Booth et al. (2023) studied heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. dapagliflozin vs. usual care was evaluated on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Dapagliflozin added to usual care was cost-effective for HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, with ICERs of £7761, €9540, and €5343 per QALY in the UK, Germany, and Spain.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: