Key result
Permanent His bundle pacing achieves 92% acute implant success with stable capture parameters during follow-up.
Why the study?
High RV pacing burden may promote left ventricular dysfunction, making His bundle pacing an alternative physiological pacing method warranting clinical evaluation.
Is permanent His bundle pacing feasible and safe in patients with various pacing indications?
Observational (n=75)
No
Is permanent His bundle pacing feasible and safe in patients with various pacing indications?
His bundle pacing is a feasible and safe physiological pacing technique with a high acute success rate, though close monitoring is required due to potential rises in capture thresholds.
His bundle pacing may support feasibility across indications; leaves open durability and need for randomized confirmation.
Background: High right ventricular (RV) pacing burden may promote left ventricular dysfunction. Recently, His bundle pacing (HBP) has emerged as an alternative method to RV pacing that provides physiological ventricular activation by directly stimulating the conduction system. Methods: Consecutive 75 patients (male 61.3%, age 65 ± 14 yrs, preserved ejection fraction 53.8%, atrial fibrillation (AF) 56%) in whom HBP was attempted at our centre between May 2018 and September 2020 were included. Acute implant success rate, complications and mid-term outcomes were assessed. Results: Permanent HBP was acutely successful in 69 patients (92%). There were no acute procedure-related complications. Most common indication was AF with rapid ventricular response (38.7%) where HBP was performed in conjunction with atrioventricular node ablation. Median fluoroscopy time was lower during the second half of implants (6.35 (2.7 – 47) vs. 5.4 (1.3 – 13.6) minutes; p = 0.004). His capture parameters remained stable during the median follow-up of 193 (59 – 342) days. Eleven patients (11/69, 15.9%) with initially successful procedure experienced a significant rise in HBP threshold. Three patients (3/69, 4.3%) needed HBP lead revision or deactivation. Conclusion: Our initial experience indicates that HBP is feasible and safe in various pacing indications. Further randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed to provide the grounds for wider clinical application of this promising physiological pacing technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivanovski et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Pacing indications (bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block) (n=75). His bundle pacing was evaluated on Acute implant success rate. Permanent His bundle pacing was acutely successful in 92% of patients, with stable capture parameters during a median follow-up of 193 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: