Key result
Exercise training improves flow-mediated dilation by ~6% in patients with HFrEF.
Why the study?
Controversies and inconsistencies remained regarding the connection between arterial tonometric technologies and exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure.
Does exercise training improve arterial stiffness measured by flow-mediated dilation and augmentation index in patients with chronic heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=876)
Does exercise training improve arterial stiffness measured by flow-mediated dilation and augmentation index in patients with chronic heart failure?
Effect estimate: SMD 5.96% (95% CI 2.81 to 9.05)
p-value: p=<0.001
Exercise training, particularly high-intensity training, significantly improves endothelial function as measured by flow-mediated dilation in patients with HFrEF, though effects on augmentation index in HFpEF remain non-significant.
Supports exercise training in HFrEF care; confirms endothelial gains and high-intensity superiority.
Background Arterial stiffness is a common characteristic in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), and arterial tonometric technologies related to arterial stiffness are novel and effective methods and have an important value in the diagnosis and prognosis of CHF. In terms of ameliorating arterial stiffness in patients with CHF, exercise training is considered an adjuvant treatment and also an effective means in the diagnosis and judgment of prognosis. However, there are huge controversies and inconsistencies in these aspects. The objective of this meta-analysis was to systematically test the connection of arterial tonometry and exercise in patients with CHF. Methods and results MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 2 June 2021. Eighteen articles were included, with a total of 876 participants satisfied the inclusion criteria. The pooling revealed that flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was lower in basal condition [standardized mean difference (SMD): -2.28%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.47 to -1.08, P<0.001] and improved significantly after exercise (SMD: 5.96%, 95%CI: 2.81 to 9.05, P<0.001) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with normal participants. High-intensity training exercise was more beneficial (SMD: 2.88%, 95% CI: 1.78 to 3.97, P<0.001) than moderate-intensity training exercise to improve FMD in patients with CHF. For augmentation index (AIx), our study indicated no significant differences (SMD: 0.50%, 95% CI: -0.05 to 1.05, p = 0.074) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with normal participants. However, other outcomes of our study were not identified after further verification using TSA, and more high-quality studies are needed to reach definitive conclusions in the future. Conclusions This review shows that FMD is lower in basal condition and improves significantly after exercise in patients with HFrEF compared with normal participants; high-intensity training exercise is more beneficial than moderate-intensity training exercise to improve FMD in patients with CHF; besides, there are no significant differences in AIx in patients with HFpEF compared with normal participants. More high-quality studies on this topic are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic heart failure (HFrEF and HFpEF) (n=876). Exercise training vs. Non-exercise was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after exercise in patients with HFrEF (SMD 5.96%, 95% CI 2.81 to 9.05, p=<0.001). Exercise training significantly improved flow-mediated dilation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (SMD 5.96%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: