Key result
Furosemide non-use is linked to ~87% higher odds of sustained reverse remodelling in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Patients with HFrEF who achieve reverse remodelling can experience a new decrease in ejection fraction, and predictors of sustained reverse remodelling are not completely understood.
Cohort (n=3,628)
No
Odds Ratio: 1.87 (95% CI 1.27–2.74)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with HFrEF, sustained reverse remodelling is associated with improved long-term survival and can be predicted by clinical and echocardiographic markers of less severe disease.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who achieve reverse remodelling (RR) can experience a new decrease in ejection fraction (EF), and the predictors of sustained RR (SRR) are not completely understood. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to identify predictors of SRR in patients with HFrEF after an increase in EF and evaluate SRR prognosis. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluated a real-life cohort of patients with HFrEF and ≥2 consecutive echocardiograms, divided according to left ventricular EF (LVEF) trajectory: no RR (NRR: 3/3 LVEF measurements < 40%), non-SRR (NSRR: second LVEF ≥ 40%, third LVEF < 40%), and SRR (SRR: second and third LVEF ≥ 40%). RESULTS: We included 3628 of 8072 assessed HF patients in the analysis, with mean age 56.2 (±13.4) years, 64.4% male and 77.7% New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II. Improved EF was observed for 1342 (37%) patients. Among those who achieved RR, 310 (23%) were NSRR, and 1032 (77%) were SRR. The mean (±SE) survival after the second echocardiogram was 10.6 (±0.2) years. The SRR group had the longest survival (12.2 ± 0.3 years), followed by the NSRR (10.6 ± 0.5) and NRR (9.8 ± 0.2 years) groups (P < 0.001). According to logistic multivariable regression, second LVEF [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.90, P < 0.001], second left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (OR = 0.93, CI = 0.90-0.96, P < 0.001), second IV septum thickness (OR = 1.12, CI = 1.03-1.23, P = 0.012), systolic blood pressure (OR = 1.01, CI = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.014), NYHA I-II (OR = 1.86, CI = 1.27-2.74, P = 0.001) and furosemide non-use (OR = 1.87, CI = 1.27-2.74, P < 0.001) independently predicted SRR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with greater EF increases and LVESD reductions at EF recovery, greater septum thickness, higher blood pressure, no need for diuretics and NYHA I/II maintenance had the best chance of maintaining recovered ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furquim et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=3,628). Furosemide non-use (and other clinical/echocardiographic predictors) vs. Furosemide use (and absence of other predictors) was evaluated on Sustained reverse remodelling (SRR) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.27-2.74, p=<0.001). In patients with HFrEF, furosemide non-use (OR 1.87), NYHA I-II status, higher second LVEF, and lower LVESD independently predicted sustained reverse remodelling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: