Key result
Baseline Time max predicts ~2% lower odds of LVRR in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
To evaluate the degree of coronary microvascular dysfunction in DCM patients using CMR first-pass perfusion parameters and examine its correlation with left ventricular reverse remodelling.
Observational (n=129)
No
Effect estimate: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.00)
p-value: p=0.032
Aims To evaluate the degree of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) first-pass perfusion parameters and to examine the correlation between myocardial perfusion and left ventricle reverse remodelling (LVRR). Methods In this study, 94 DCM patients and 35 healthy controls matched for age and sex were included. Myocardial perfusion parameters, including upslope, time to maximum signal intensity (Time max ), maximum signal intensity (SI max ), baseline signal intensity (SI baseline ), and the difference between maximum and baseline signal intensity (SI max−baseline ) were measured. Additionally, left ventricular (LV) structure, function parameters, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were also recorded. The parameters were compared between healthy controls and DCM patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of LVRR. Results With a median follow-up period of 12 months [interquartile range (IQR), 8–13], 41 DCM patients (44%) achieved LVRR. Compared with healthy controls, DCM patients presented CMD with reduced upslope, SI baseline , and increased Time max (all p < 0.01). Time max , SI max , and SI max−baseline were further decreased in LVRR than non-LVRR group (Time max : 60.35 [IQR, 51.46–74.71] vs. 72.41 [IQR, 59.68–97.70], p = 0.017; SI max : 723.52 [IQR, 209.76–909.27] vs. 810.92 [IQR, 581.30–996.89], p = 0.049; SI max−baseline : 462.99 [IQR, 152.25–580.43] vs. 551.13 [IQR, 402.57–675.36], p = 0.038). In the analysis of multivariate logistic regression, Time max [odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.00; p = 0.032)], heart rate (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01–1.08; p = 0.029), LV remodelling index (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.06–3.00; p = 0.038) and LGE extent (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.96; p = 0.021) were independent predictors of LVRR. Conclusions CMD could be found in DCM patients and was more impaired in patients with non-LVRR than LVRR patients. Time max at baseline was an independent predictor of LVRR in DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kan et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=129). Time to maximum signal intensity (Time max) was evaluated on Left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p=0.032). Baseline time to maximum signal intensity (Time max) was an independent predictor of left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (OR 0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: