Key result
Each CHA2DS2-VA point increase is linked to ~40% higher mortality in ICD patients, but fails to predict VA.
Why the study?
The study investigated the value of the revised CHA2DS2-VA score for predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and ventricular arrhythmia in ICD patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy.
Does the CHA2DS2-VA score predict mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=1,626)
No
Does the CHA2DS2-VA score predict mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy?
The CHA2DS2-VA score is a strong predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in ICD patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy, but it is not effective for predicting ventricular arrhythmias.
May aid mortality stratification in ICD patients; leaves open utility for arrhythmia prediction or practice change.
Background and aims The revised CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score facilitates stroke risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study investigates the value of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA for prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Methods We analyzed data from 1,626 ICD recipients with IHD ( n = 1,225) or DCM ( n = 401) enrolled in a prospective registry at University Hospital Basel. Patients were stratified into low and high CHA 2 DS 2 -VA groups based on median score within each condition. Mortality and VA outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Results The median CHA 2 DS 2 -VA was 3 overall, 2 in DCM, and 4 in IHD patients. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 46% died, with an all-cause mortality rate of 6.1 per 100 patient-years. Higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VA scores were associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in both IHD (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.99–2.80, p < 0.001 for all-cause death) and DCM (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.44–2.73, p < 0.001 for all-cause death). Each one-point increase in CHA 2 DS 2 -VA increased mortality risk (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.34–1.47, p < 0.001 for all-cause death). No association was observed between CHA 2 DS 2 -VA and VA occurrence in the overall cohort or subgroups. Conclusion The CHA 2 DS 2 -VA is strongly associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in ICD patients with IHD and DCM, but does not predict VA. Thus, it may aid in mortality risk stratification but should not be used as a primary tool for arrhythmic risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vögeli et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart disease and dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing ICD therapy (n=1,626). CHA2DS2-VA score was evaluated on All-cause mortality (per one-point increase in score) (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.34-1.47, p=<0.001). Each one-point increase in the CHA2DS2-VA score was associated with a 40% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.40) in ICD patients with ischemic heart disease and dilated cardiomyopathy, but did not predict ventricular arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: